Friday 23 May 2008

is the real girl really the real boy? is that so hard to believe?

Lars and the Real Girl

The story of an emotionally stunted young man who finds salvation in a saintly sex-doll-as-human with community support, has proven to be a difficult premise for many to accept. Why has this story gained so much more resistance than the false realities presented in so many other contemporary films?



The initial discomfort in Lars' delusion (other than the uncomfortable truth of the existence of Real Dolls), is partially the fault of the film's marketing department. The promotional material, namely the poster, styled not too dissimilar to Garden State, Napolean Dynamite and Juno, screams quirky indie comedy. The comedy however, is only a result of the drama; chuckles of relief from painful and ridiculous scenarios. Not surprising given the first-time screenwriter Nancy Oliver's history in the dark, but often quite comedic HBO series Six Feet Under (Remember when Ruth accidentally gets high on Ecstasy?!). What kind of audiences would a film with a sex doll as a main character attract? Quirky indie comedy is safer, closer to the truth, and it gets bums on seats.

By the time Lars orders his Real Doll, and his delusion has come to fruition, we have largely forgotten the premise of the film, and are now invested in a sweet yet intensely socially withdrawn character. So the arrival of his new girlfriend and his eagerness to share not only himself, but his new girlfriend with his family, comes as quite a shock. Her integration into his life is the make or break point in the film.

Thankfully, sex is ruled out before we can apply to him any creepy labels. His interpretation of her background is relieving (also hilarious and poignant). He wants only goodness. It's at this point that he is officially diagnosed as delusional. Not only a harmless condition in this case, but potentially very positive. It's his chance to allow himself to grow. Once the community gets on board, we're either with him or we're his brother. Accept Bianca or find the whole thing just too ridiculous.

The suspension of belief in films is an everyday occurrence. However we don't generally see it in this context, or in this formula. It's uncharted territory. Not easy to accept. But if we do let go, and side with Lars' plight, we may realise how not uncommon this is. As children, we project characters onto beloved dolls and bears. Many of us give our pets and inanimate objects personalities. We often even project our own qualities onto those around us in order to establish and maintain relationships, and we seek relationships with people that possess qualities that we aspire to. Perhaps it was a bit of that, as well the compassionate nature of the local community, that allowed them to so readily accept and play along with his delusion. If nothing else, it gave them an opportunity to interact with, and ultimately help get Lars where they wanted to be - with them.



Bianca's existence was not so simple as to simply fill Lars' girlfriend void. She was all the things he wanted to be, but couldn't. She was necessary for him to make such a dramatic transition. She paved the road from his broken and emotionally stunted past, into his desired future of shared familial and communal love and acceptance.

Being a separate entity from her creator, Bianca served inspiringly as the hero's projected metamorphoses. Emotional growth and communal healing, made possible only by the compassion, love, and kindness of those around him. Which is all any of us ever really want. How we achieve that is never simple, and can often appear somewhat ridiculous.

The events of the film may not realistically reflect life as it is, but it does show us how it can be.

Reviews & Interviews:
Roger Ebert review
Wall Street Journal review
At The Movies: review or director interview
Director's interview on Ain't It Cool News
Scribe's interview in the New York Times
More reviews

Official trailer via Apple.com

A psychological list of defenses including projection
Delusion - Wikipedia

Monday 12 May 2008

not quite art

The art show that believes there is life outside the galleries.



Marcus Westbury, creator and host of the utterly fantastic ABC series Not Quite Art is working on season 2, and he wants your ideas.

From the Facebook group Friends of Marcus' Not Quite Art TV Show:

Dear friends of the show,

Sorry for the spam but at least i am trying to consolidate these things now.

1. If you loved Not Quite Art (or hated it and just want a decent quality copy to complain) then you can now buy DVDs of the first series. A bargain at $34.95! I'd sign them for you but i'm not physically near the big room with all the DVDs in it. However i do promise to buy you a beer if you see me around and you have some verifiable proof that you bought a copy!

Buy them from here (or make someone else buy them from here):

http://www.barefoot.net.au/films/not-quite-art.aspx

Buy one, i'm poor!

2. I've written a big essay for a fancy literature journal. It's called Fluid Cities Create and it is in the current edition of Griffith REVIEW. If you watched and liked NQA you will probably recognise a lot of the themes that i've explored in the essay.

To read all about it and download a PDF for FREE, go to my web site:

http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2008/05/10/griffith-review-essay-fluid-cities-create/

3. Last, but not least, I am still on the lookout for interesting people, artists and ideas to appear in the next series (which was going to be called Culture Shock and is now probably going to be called Not Quite Art again). To find out more about what the series is about visit this page:

http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2008/03/25/culture-shock/

Oh, and if you're bored and trying to kill some time you can also read about my hilarious shenanigans at the TV Week (tm) Logie (tm) awards (tm). Strangest. Night. Ever:

http://www.marcuswestbury.net/2008/05/05/a-night-at-the-logies/

thanks,

marcus.

Saturday 10 May 2008

the first official fuglies ceremony and how I came to be their first official photographer



Ok so I'm using the term 'official' a bit strongly here. Either way it makes us all feel a bit more special, so why not.

So other than the obvious, what are The Fuglies? Well I'm glad you asked...


The Fuglies were started as an alternative to the Logies for people who wanted to vote for the worst of what has been on TV in categories that TV Week magazine keep forgetting to add to the Logies voting form.

Well, I was fortunate enough to attend the official ceremony itself, last Friday (in between reviews - go me!)... as the 'official' photographer. The guy from MX showed up... he seemed a bit disappointed that no-one showed up to accept their awards... hmm. Well MX guy, maybe next year. I'm sure Kyle Sandilands will make the effort, he was a big winner this time.

Anyway, it was great fun. The lovely sponser boys from Another Bloody Water were filming for an entertaining, upcoming (will add it when it's up) youtube video. David Knox was reporting for his blog TV Tonight. And the host/organiser/and very not fugly creator Anthony was great... he's just got a way with connecting to the masses.





Um no that's not me that's the MX guy... obviously.

Friday 9 May 2008

game on

Play your way through the history of video games.



How awesome is ACMI!

I've been looking at this exhibition the wrong way though. As soon as I heard of it, I thought, perfect, I'm gonna shoot there. But the bigness of that idea has probably prevented me from actually going.

I just wanna go and play games! After that, I'll think about whether or not I want to shoot there. My sister's coming down from Perth tomorrow, I'll try and convince her to come. I think she'll just get flashbacks of me kicking her ass at Mortal Kombat when we were kids, essentially killing any interest in games or competition for the rest of her life. Sorry Sara. I think I'll have to bring my other sister instead... we've spent probably around 3 years trying to clock Vice City... and then settling for leaving Tommy in a quiet car on the beach so we can just listen to Wave 103 in the background.

And on a random sidenote... when I was studying animation at Deakin, I had grand plans of directing a music video for Datarock (who kindly gave me permission to play with their music, thanks guys!), for their crazy cool tune, Computer Camp Love. I envisaged a Summer Camp fantasy with Kip from Napolean Dynamite as the hero, intercut with big band/80s staged dance shots and animations from a Commodore 64 (and since I have no access to one the closest my imagination could get was an Atari). Obviously my glad plans were way too big for me... but it gave me a chance to try and learn a bit of Flash and After Effects. This is the first 8 seconds of my video... which is coming soon... promise.

epiphany!

For some reason I only really tend to get clarity and the occasional epiphany around this time of day (night/morning... whatever). I should move to the opposite side of the planet and see what happens.

Anyway... I realised why I'm having trouble really visualising the images I want to make (or being comfortable enough with them in my mind to really get started).

They have to be self-portraits! Go the self-indulgence. But not really, I think that's the only way to make them true, to resonate! I don't literally want to be the person in them (although so far the only successful image thus far is exactly that).

I was reading something earlier (that I can't find therefore can't reference)... I think it was an article from Photofile... anyway it may have been a review of the Happiness exhibition with Lyndal and Darren at pica in Perth (should I say their full names when speaking about them as artists rather than educators?). There was a mention of 'slackers'. It stuck with me. A title came to mind: slackers: subjective on the community. Well, it's a working title.

I tend to become attracted to justification, especially when it comes to the underdog. It might sound noble but it's really just me trying to stick up for myself. I won't stick up for them (well I won't spend a university year and lots and lots of money trying to work out the most visually poetic way to justify their actions!) if I don't sympathise or identify with them.

I wanted to do this because I am interested in the screen. I love it. It's my saviour! I know we all tend to idolize it... screen idols are the new Greek Gods (whatever)... but really, the media is so fucking hugely influential most of us can't even see the tip of the iceberg! We're conditioned not to! And it really does work. Media Watch people!! At the same time, it's not necessarily the worst form of escapism. After some particularly extreme difficulties in my life, I made a conscious decision to escape into the false realities of Sunnydale and other rich and engaging fictional realities. Really, it was that or drugs. Drugs are bad, mmm-kay!

So what I have to do now, is reflect. If all I can do is justify, then I'll justify. Using prettier people and good lighting.

social psychology

"I have been primarily interested in how and why ordinary people do unusual things, things that seem alien to their natures. Why do good people sometimes act evil? Why do smart people sometimes do dumb or irrational things?" --Philip Zimbardo

What dictates human behavior? Everything we do is motivated by something... some past experience, association, influence. Why do we do the things we do? Our social environments play such an extreme influential role... just check out the Milgram Experiment or Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment, its fucking scary.

Last year I did a social psychology elective. It was absolutely the most mind-blowing subject I think I've ever taken. It wasn't difficult... it's the things we all already kinda know, but just to be able to become aware of and make sense of these things was an incredible experience. It had such an impact on me I was seriously considering switching Fine Art Photography for a career in Social Psychology. I obviously didn't. I don't need to. The course I am in is perfect for me. I can ultimately study anything I want, and create something out of it! I love it. It's satisfying, but not easy. Either way, its something I will always study. I might even crash a few of the lectures again as a refresher. And there's a couple of other interesting online psych classes available at RMIT, so I might have a look at them too.

Psychology of Social Life (BESC1072) with the wonderfully entertaining Dr. Mervin Jackson
Psychology of Cyberspace (CTXT1379) with Dr. Andrea Chester
Happiness and positive Psychology (BESC1479) with Dr. Marc Cohen



I've been thinking a lot about community. It's going to play a big role in my work, now, and probably forever. Social environments. We are social beings. So it's kind of inevitable. I study what I want to know. Essentially, people are what I want to know.


10 Brilliant Psychological studies